An international research team, led by astronomers from
the University of Tokyo, Hiroshima University, and the
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, used the
Subaru telescope to obtain the spectrum of SN2003jd,
a hypernova unaccompanied by a gamma-ray burst, and
found the first evidence that it is a jet-like explosion
viewed off-axis. Hypernovae are hyper-energetic Supernovae
that are often associated with gamma-ray bursts. This
result provides clear and firm evidence that all Hypernovae
may be associated with gamma-ray bursts, but that gamma-ray
bursts are observable only when jets produced by the
hypernova explosion point towards Earth.
An international research team, (*1)
led by astronomers from the University of Tokyo, Hiroshima
University, and the National Astronomical Observatory of
Japan, has obtained a spectrum of Supernova 2003jd (*2)
using the Faint
Object Camera And Spectrograph (FOCAS) instrument on
the Subaru telescope in Hawai’i. The supernova was
actually a hypernova, the product of catastrophic core collapse
in an extremely massive star. The data, taken on September
12, 2004 (about a year after the initial explosion), exhibited
some of the expected emission lines of various elements,
including oxygen, nitrogen, and magnesium. However, there
was something out of the ordinary: double-peaked oxygen
emission lines at 630 and 636 nanometers which suggested
that the astronomers were witnessing a donut of oxygen rich
debris from the side. The debris was created as two jets
of material emerged from the explosion near the speed of
light, punching a hole through material that had been a
star. This matches predictions of what gamma-ray bursts,
some of the most energetic outbursts in the universe, would
look like when viewed from the side. This observation marks
the first time such a line shape has been observed, overcoming
the difficulty of taking spectra of a fading supernova this
later after the initial explosion. This discovery gives
firm evidence supporting a unified theory that gamma-ray
bursts are the products of light-speed jets moving out from
asymmetric hypernova explosions.
While many stellar explosions are spherically
symmetrical, some are not. In these cases, the deviation
from spherical symmetry gives a hint as to what is going
on during the explosion. A gamma-ray burst (GRB) is among
the most energetic explosions in the universe and is an
interesting example of an aspherical explosion.
Astronomers were baffled for decades by
gamma-ray bursts. Following the successful observation of
a number of gamma-ray bursts and their after-glows, the
current understanding is that these events are taking place
at cosmological (that is, very large) distances –
from as far away as a few billion light-years. At those
distances, an explosion would need to be extremely large,
bright and energetic to be observable from Earth. If these
explosions were spherically symmetric, their energy output
would exceed the Sun’s total energy output over a
lifetime by several times within in a very short period.
If the explosion is jet-like rather than spherical, the
energy output can be more modest and more realistic. In
this case, only gamma-ray bursts whose jet axis happens
to point toward Earth would be observable.
Recent research supports the jet hypothesis.
A class of long-duration gamma-ray bursts had been linked
with hypernova explosions though previous research. For
example, astronomers from the University of Tokyo and the
National Astronomical Observatory of Japan found that the
gamma-ray burst GRB030329 and the hypernova SN 2003dh appeared
at the same place and at the same time (*3)
in the year 2003. They also discovered possible evidence
for high velocity jets associated with the hypernova SN2002ap
whose polarized light and unpolarized light have different
Doppler shifts. Summarizing these discoveries, the research
team proposed a unified model for gamma-ray bursts: a hypernova
explosion of a collapsing massive star releasing a pair
of high-velocity jets (*4).
This bipolar explosion model predicts that
relatively light elements such as oxygen should be ejected
in a doughnut-shaped debris ring at the “equator”
of an explosion. If the event is viewed from the polar direction,
a gamma-ray burst shows up. If it is observed from the side,
the gamma-ray burst cannot be seen. Furthermore, oxygen
emission lines will show a different appearance that depends
on the viewing orientation, because the observed Doppler
shift depends on the orientation of the non-spherically
symmetric debris. The line should appear as a single-peaked
line for a face-on observer in the polar direction. For
an edge-on observer placed at the equator, it will appear
as a double-peaked line, corresponding to materials moving
toward and away from us (*5).
The observation of SN 2003jd (Figure
1) provided astronomers a golden opportunity
to link models of such explosions with observed evidence
of bipolar structure and its effect on the expected observations
of a gamma-ray burst. Earlier observations of the supernova
during its peak in brightness had already revealed that
it was a hypernova, an explosion caused by the catastrophic
core collapse of an extremely massive star. Since there
was no known gamma-ray burst accompanying the hypernova,
SN2003jd was an excellent observational candidate to test
the unified theory of gamma-rays and Hypernovae. Up to the
present, the spectra of Hypernovae had shown only single-peaked
oxygen emissions lines. This is because astronomers preferentially
observed hypernovas associated with gamma-ray bursts, and
because such observations are difficult to do and thus few
in number. The difficulty arises because hypernovas fade
very rapidly. The light gathering and resolving power the
Subaru telescope’s large 8.2 meter diameter aperture
gave the research team a chance to observe a double-peaked
emission line in SN2003jd.
Indeed, when the team observed SN 2003jd
on September 12, 2004, about one year after the initial
explosion, there were prominent oxygen lines in the red
part of the spectrum at 630 and 636 nm matching the double-peaked
profile predicted by the theory. This discovery provides
strong evidence that the unified model proposed by the research
group is correct: a Gamma-ray burst is produced by light-speed
jets from a very asymmetric hypernova explosion.
This work was published in the May 27,
2005, edition of the journal Science.
*1:
The research team includes astronomers from the University
of Tokyo, Hiroshima University, the National Astronomical
Observatory, Max-Planck Institute (Germany), Trieste
Observatory (Italy), the University of California
(US), Princeton Institute for Advanced Study (US),
Padova Observatory (Italy), the National Astronomical
Observatory of China, Japan Aerospace Exploration
Agency, Graduate University for Advanced Studies,
the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (US), Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory (US), and the California Institute
of Technology (US).
*2:
SN 2003jd was discovered on 25 October 2003 (UT) by
Lick Observatory Supernova Search using the Katzman
Automatic Imaging Telescope. It is located in a spiral
galaxy MCG-01-59-21 (Figure
1) at the distance about three hundred
million light-years away from the Earth. A spectrum
around its maximum brightness showed it was a hyper-energetic
supernova (hypernova) from a core-collapse massive
star, similar to Gamma-Ray Burst related supernovae
SNe 1998bw and 2003dh.
*3:
“Gamma-Ray Bursts = Hypernovae?!”
Subaru Telescope Scientific Results on 13 June 2003.
http://www.naoj.org/Pressrelease/2003/06/index.html
*4:
It is generally agreed that a massive star,
whose mass exceeds eight times that of the Sun, ends
its life when its central iron core collapses, and
rebounds to create a gigantic explosion. This is called
a core-collapse supernova. A hypernova is believed
to be the outcome of a supernova explosion from a
star at least 20 times heavier than the sun (*3).
*5:
According to the bipolar explosion model for an asymmetric
supernova and calculations of nucleosynthsis, iron
is ejected toward the polar direction while oxygen
is along the equatorial direction in a doughnut-like
shaped debris (Figure
2). A profile of an emission line of oxygen
is different depending on the inclination between
the polar and the observer’s directions. The
oxygen emission line (a blend of lines at 630, 636nm)
showed a double-peaked profile (Figure
2, right-bottom
panel), in contrast to the single peak seen in another
hypernova SN 1998bw (Figure
2, top panel). The double-peaked profile
is in good accordance with a theoretical expectation
for a jet-like aspherical hypernova viewed from the
side. The analysis of the emission line profile, together
with the non-detection of a Gamma-Ray Bursts associated
with SN 2003jd, added a new and firm evidence for
the theoretical model, that is, a Gamma-Ray bursts
emerges as a consequence of a bipolar, aspherical
hypernova explosion. |
|
|
Figure1
A Subaru/FOCAS image of SN 2003jd and its host galaxy
MCG-01-59-21 (about three hundred million light
years from the Earth). The image is synthesized
from B-band (with 30 seconds exposure) and R-band
(5 seconds) images taken by Subaru on 12 September
2004. In the image, top and left correspond to north
and east, and the field of view is about 3.2 arcmin
x 2.3 arcmin. SN 2003 jd appeared at the left-bottom
of the nucleus of the host galaxy, as marked by
yellow lines. |
| |
|
|
Figure2 The distribution of elements numerically
computed for the bipolar hypernova explosion model
(left-bottom). Theoretical line profiles computed
on the basis of the elements distribution are compared
with oxygen lines detected in SNe 1998bw (top) and
2003jd (right-bottom). In the explosion, high-velocity
jets are ejected along the polar directions (top
and bottom directions). Iron (colored in green and
blue) is ejected toward the polar direction, while
oxygen (brown) is along the equatorial direction.
The latter is confined in a dense, doughnut-like
shaped debris (see density contours shown in black).
In the panels for the emission lines, the theoretically
predicted lines (RED) for an observer
placed at the polar direction (top) and at the equatorial
direction (right-bottom) are compared to observed
oxygen emission line profiles (BLACK)
in SN 1998bw and 2003jd, respectively. The emission
line profiles are in good accordance with the interpretation,
that is, SNe 1998bw and 2003jd are intrinsically
similar events, but viewed at the different direction.
It is also consistent with the fact that a Gamma-Ray
Burst showed up with SN 1998bw but not with SN 2003jd. |
May 26, 2005 |